Oppo A37 vs Samsung Galaxy J3 (2016)
Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Oppo A37 on one side and the Samsung Galaxy J3 (2016) on the other. The first has a processor with 4 cores, 4 threads, a maximale frequency of 1.2GHz. The second chips has a total of 4 cores, 4 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 1.3GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench 4.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specifications:
| Smartphone | Oppo A37 | Samsung Galaxy J3 (2016) | ||||||
| Model version(s) | A37f, A37fw, A37m | SM-J3109, SM-J320A, SM-J320F, SM-J320FN, SM-J320G, SM-J320H, SM-J320M, SM-J320N0, SM-J320P, SM-J327T1, SM-J320V, SM-J320W8, SM-J320Y, SM-J320YZ, SM-J320ZN |
||||||
| Release date | Q2 2016 | Q1 2016 | ||||||
| Network | GSM, HSPA, LTE | GSM, HSPA, LTE | ||||||
| Dimensions | 5,63 x 2,80 x 0,30 in | 5,60 x 2,80 x 0,31 in | ||||||
| Weight | 4.80 oz | 4.87 oz | ||||||
| Body | Front glass, aluminum body |
Plastic body | ||||||
| Screen size, colours | 5.0 inches, 16M colours | 5.0 inches, 16M colours | ||||||
| Screen type | IPS LCD | PLS | ||||||
| Resolution | 720 x 1280 pixels | 720 x 1280 pixels | ||||||
| Screen ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 | ||||||
| Density | 294 ppi | 294 ppi | ||||||
| Operating system | Android 5.1; ColorOS 3 | Android 5.1.1 | ||||||
| Processor | Qualcomm MSM8916 Snapdragon 410 | Unisoc SC9830 | ||||||
| Lithography | 28 nm LP | 28 nm HPM | ||||||
| Cores | 4 | 4 | ||||||
| Threads | 4 | 4 | ||||||
| High performance cores | 4x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 1.2 GHz | 4x ARM Cortex-A7 @ 1.3 GHz | ||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | Qualcomm Adreno 306 | ARM Mali-400 MP2 | ||||||
| GPU execution units | 1 | 2 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | 24 | 32 | ||||||
| GPU base clock | 450 MHz | 200 MHz | ||||||
| GPU boost clock | 450 MHz | 600 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | 19.2 GFLOPS | 10.8 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Memory | 2 GB RAM | 1.5 / 2 GB RAM | ||||||
| Storage | 16 GB | 8 / 16 GB | ||||||
| Memory card | Up to 256 GB | Up to 256 GB | ||||||
| Photo | 8 MP, f/2,0 | 8 MP, f/2,2 | ||||||
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 720p@30fps | ||||||
| Front photo | 5 MP, f/2,4 | 5 MP, f/2,2 | ||||||
| Front video | 720p@30fps | 720p@30fps | ||||||
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/cakrawala | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | ||||||
| Bluetooth | 4.0, A2DP | 4.1, A2DP, LE | ||||||
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 | ||||||
| Battery capacity | 2,630 mAh | 2,600 mAh | ||||||
| Battery type | Non-removable Li-ion | Non removable Li-Ion | ||||||
| Battery life (versatile use) | ~ 8 hours and 30 minutes | ~ 8 hours and 30 minutes | ||||||
| TDP | – | 3 W | ||||||
| Head SAR (EU) | – | 0.25 W/kg | ||||||
| Body SAR (EU) | – | 1.23 W/kg | ||||||
| AnTuTu | 25,232 | 22,415 | ||||||
|
(Android 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core |
519 | 451 | ||||||
|
(Android 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core |
1,315 | 1,177 | ||||||
| Amazon |
|
|
||||||
| eBay |
|
|
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. Both phones have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of Samsung Galaxy J3 (2016) is larger. They were produced the same year.
Autonomy:
the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc …
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a benaran-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment titinada to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
Performances :
Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench 4.
| AnTuTu – Total score | |
|---|---|
Oppo A37
|
25,232 |
| Samsung Galaxy J3 (2016)
|
22,415 |
The difference is 13%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.
On Android 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 – Multi-core & single core score – Android 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Oppo A37
|
519 1,315 |
| Samsung Galaxy J3 (2016)
|
451 1,177 |
In single core, the difference is 15%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 12%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances siring with these smartphones, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory tentamen. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
See also:
Oppo A31Oppo A33Oppo A33 (2020)Oppo A36Oppo A37fOppo A3s
Samsung Galaxy J3 (2016) Exynos
Disclaimer:
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.
Information:
We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer’s website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.
Oppo A37 Vs J3 2016
Source: https://gadgetversus.com/smartphone/oppo-a37-vs-samsung-galaxy-j3-%282016%29/
